Bryant is one of the best scorers in 10 NBA all time, the more points than anyone in history has one of the most successful franchises in the NBA and has over 80 years, 30 playoff games of his career.
No one will deny the ability to fill from Bryant to a panel, but the procedure that the delivery encourage Bryant in Game 1 of the semifinals of the Western Conference to some, its size question.
Bryant 36 points in 14 to 29 Shots in Game 1 is impressive, but it is also the center Andrew Bynum eight points on 3-8 shooting in the field.
So how could less than Bynum to see in a mediocre game to understand in any way as impressive?
For the simple reason that to say Bryant and the rest of the Lakers, Bynum that there are not decided.
The biggest advantage of the Lakers in the playoffs is their size and talent in painting with Bynum, Pau Gasol and Lamar Odom.
The Lakers are wearing big enough for most teams in a seven-game series, and there are some teams that can boast three players such as Bynum, Gasol and Odom are classified.
And Bynum is the key, especially since it the title of the top center of the NBA playoffs since 2011 inherited Dwight Howard and the Orlando Magic were eliminated.
Bynum is bigger and stronger than their Western counterparts semifinals Tyson Chandler and Brendan Haywood, but the size and strength are not important, because Bynum is too much talent.
The few times that the Lakers chose to run their offense in Game 1 Bynum showed great footwork in the paint, but most of all decisions and Bynum has spent together two great time.
Bynum plays with confidence and concern, despite his trembling knees, and seems willing to really grow, but only Bryant pass the chance.
It has long been a view from many states Bryant shoots and results have been divided, the chances of the Lakers lost this game in particular also increased.
I would say that the opinion of 50 percent is correct, because the Lakers, a team with enough talent to be successful with 29 shots on the field at Bryant, but his performance does not always support this theory.
Each of the Lakers, who have a star player like Odom and Gasol with attacks treated could be regarded by inconsistency and if Bynum has been an endless stream of injuries.
Bryant was the only constant in each episode, and in many cases, his aggressive approach has been in certain situations that have saved the Lakers to give them new life.
But Bryant is also a victim of his own talent and was sometimes shown in 4.9 shooting performance of the line at three points in Game 1 against Dallas.
Bryant scored a couple of long shots, which contributed to an early 16-point lead for the Lakers, but take the ball into the paint, where the greatest benefit was of his team hides, Bryant has continued to the attic perimeter library.
Bryant restraint in order to work the ball played in the post, the Lakers the opportunity to maintain or increase to 16 points.
This brings me back to Bynum.
Bynum was a Laker next to Bryant, who has played basketball since the All-Stars, and is the only player on the Mavericks not to respond to the physics.
Why not Bynum the ball?
I love Bryant on the extent of the mud work, but the best chance for the Lakers three peat Bryant is not a jump shot.
A third NBA championship in a row for the Lakers probably depends on its ability to feed the ball to Bynum in the paint, but the biggest challenge that you can get Bryant to accept this truth.
Bryant performance in the playoffs then used as a measure of his legacy, but acknowledge that his team would win at least their offense could be a turning point.
I think Bryant is a legendary player and when he retired, he will be remembered as one of the greatest games of all time.
However, Bryant has the opportunity to raise his legend even in the heights and all it takes is a little generosity, and some passes to Bynum hunger in color.
没有评论:
发表评论